NCEF provides financial assistance that enables many poor Nepalese children to attend school. Many children in Nepal—especially, the ones in rural areas—need financial assistance to continue their education. Due to limited resources, NCEF cannot support all the students that apply for financial assistance (through our area coordinators). Every year, the task of the selection committee is to identify the most needy students who would be supported by NCEF.
The Team:
The student selection committee for the year 2009-2010 consisted of the following members.
- Uttam Sharma (Chair)
- Bigyan Acharya
- Bhusan Neupane
- Hari Tripathi
- Laura Satkamp
- Maheshwor Kafle

Figure 1: NCEF’s areas of operation in Nepal
Procedure:
We collected applications for renewal of financial assistance from Dolakha, Kathmandu, Kavre, Rasuwa, Nepalgunj and Patan. This year NCEF decided to support additional students in Dolakha, and also include Birgunj, Lamatar, and Sunsari as new areas of operation. Several children from these areas applied to be considered for financial assistance for the first time.
Our first task was to define the criteria for student selection. These criteria can be viewed at http://www.nepalchildren.org/selection_criteria.html. Next, we designed the application forms for renewal as well as new students (available for download at http://www.nepalchildren.org/about.html#apps ).
We sent the application forms to our field volunteers in Nepal. Field volunteers distributed the new applications to schools as well as to the parents. They also distributed the renewal applications to all students that received financial assistance during the previous year.
Field volunteers collected the applications and academic transcripts from schools. They scanned all these documents, and emailed them to NCEF selection committee. For each renewal applicant, they also provided their recommendation on whether or not NCEF should continue funding the student. After receiving all the applications from an area, they were distributed to all the selection committee members.
The Selection Process:
NCEF’s financial resources and the availability of field volunteers determine the number of students selected from each area. For each area, every selection committee member ranks all the applicants based on their application and the recommendations from field volunteers. Average of this ranking is calculated for each student and top candidates from this list are selected for financial assistance. Ties were resolved through discussion and voting amongst the selection committee members. If certain renewal applications require special consideration, we review such applications carefully, often interacting with the field volunteers for additional information and document any requirements that are waived.
Results:
All together we selected 64 students. Some of the renewal applications were for students who had passed the SLC examination. These decisions could not be made until after the SLC examination results were declared, and hence, were made separately from the rest of the students.
One student required special consideration for funding approval. Under NCEF requirement, a student has to pass their final grade exam in order to be eligible for renewal of funding. This student failed the final exam. However, after careful analysis of the situation, and strong recommendation from the student’s teachers and field volunteer, the selection committee decided to fund the student who now has an opportunity to improve his/her grades. The student has been given formal notice that the funding is contingent upon demonstrated improvement of his/her study.

Figure 2: Breakdown of supported students in each area

Figure 3: Number of supported male and female students
Challenges:
One of the main challenges that selection committee faced this year was the inability to collect complete applications from Nepal on time. Most of the time, applications were incomplete, and some did not have academic reports. For renewal students we did not receive the applications of all students from each geographical location all at once. These problems led to the delay in student selection. The selection committee had to review the applications on an ongoing basis. This made the process challenging to get the ranking and review from all selection committee members on time.
Recommendations:
The main cause of delay for selection had been the applications not getting to the selection committee on time. Another issue is the veracity of the income levels reported in the new student applications. To the best of our knowledge, the field volunteers can rely only on the income level reported by the student’s family when filling out the application forms. In general, almost all our student applicants are from poor families and deserving of NCEF support. Unfortunately, since we cannot support all our applicants and family’s income is an important criterion for selection, NCEF is in the process of addressing this issue by developing more comprehensive and context-specific surveys to collect household resources.
Acknowledgments:
The selection committee would like to thank all the NCEF volunteers for collecting and sending student applications.